Skip Navigation

Receive this page by email each issue: [Sign up for eTOCs]

Cover Image
Other Issues:
Previous Next
Contents: Volume 6, Number 1-4, March/December 2007   [Index by Author] 

Down Articles


[Search ALL Issues]


Table of Contents (PDF)

To see an article, click its [Full Text] or [PDF] link. To review many abstracts, check the boxes to the left of the titles you want, and click the 'Get All Checked Abstract(s)' button. To see one abstract at a time, click its [Abstract] link.

Articles Back

Peter Tillers
Introduction: visualizing evidence and inference in legal settings
Law, Probability and Risk Advance Access published on October 27, 2007
Law Probability and Risk 2007 6: 1-4; doi:10.1093/lpr/mgm006 [PDF] [Request Permissions]  

Vern R. Walker
Visualizing the dynamics around the rule–evidence interface in legal reasoning
Law, Probability and Risk Advance Access published on August 19, 2007
Law Probability and Risk 2007 6: 5-22; doi:10.1093/lpr/mgm015 [Abstract] [PDF] [Request Permissions]  

Tim van Gelder
The rationale for RationaleTM
Law, Probability and Risk Advance Access published on October 10, 2007
Law Probability and Risk 2007 6: 23-42; doi:10.1093/lpr/mgm032 [Abstract] [PDF] [Request Permissions]  

John L. Pollock
Reasoning and probability
Law, Probability and Risk Advance Access published on October 17, 2007
Law Probability and Risk 2007 6: 43-58; doi:10.1093/lpr/mgm014 [Abstract] [PDF] [Request Permissions]  

Chris Reed and Glenn Rowe
A pluralist approach to argument diagramming
Law, Probability and Risk Advance Access published on December 1, 2007
Law Probability and Risk 2007 6: 59-85; doi:10.1093/lpr/mgm030 [Abstract] [PDF] [Request Permissions]  

Dale A. Nance
The inferential arrow: a comment on interdisciplinary conversation
Law, Probability and Risk Advance Access published on September 25, 2007
Law Probability and Risk 2007 6: 87-95; doi:10.1093/lpr/mgm035 [PDF] [Request Permissions]  

Terence J. Anderson
Visualization tools and argument schemes: a question of standpoint
Law, Probability and Risk Advance Access published on November 26, 2007
Law Probability and Risk 2007 6: 97-107; doi:10.1093/lpr/mgm039 [PDF] [Request Permissions]  

Thomas F. Gordon
Visualizing Carneades argument graphs
Law, Probability and Risk Advance Access published on October 10, 2007
Law Probability and Risk 2007 6: 109-117; doi:10.1093/lpr/mgm026 [Abstract] [PDF] [Request Permissions]  

Douglas Walton
Visualization tools, argumentation schemes and expert opinion evidence in law
Law, Probability and Risk Advance Access published on October 10, 2007
Law Probability and Risk 2007 6: 119-140; doi:10.1093/lpr/mgm033 [Abstract] [PDF] [Request Permissions]  

Terence J. Anderson
Visualization tools and argument schemes revisited
Law, Probability and Risk Advance Access published on November 2, 2007
Law Probability and Risk 2007 6: 141-144; doi:10.1093/lpr/mgm036 [PDF] [Request Permissions]  

Floris Bex, Susan van den Braak, Herre van Oostendorp, Henry Prakken, Bart Verheij, and Gerard Vreeswijk
Sense-making software for crime investigation: how to combine stories and arguments?
Law, Probability and Risk Advance Access published on July 7, 2007
Law Probability and Risk 2007 6: 145-168; doi:10.1093/lpr/mgm007 [Abstract] [PDF] [Request Permissions]  

William Twining
Argumentation, stories and generalizations: a comment
Law, Probability and Risk Advance Access published on August 13, 2007
Law Probability and Risk 2007 6: 169-185; doi:10.1093/lpr/mgm008 [Abstract] [PDF] [Request Permissions]  

Bart Verheij
Argumentation support software: boxes-and-arrows and beyond
Law, Probability and Risk Advance Access published on October 17, 2007
Law Probability and Risk 2007 6: 187-208; doi:10.1093/lpr/mgm017 [Abstract] [PDF] [Request Permissions]  

Burkhard Schafer
Can you have too much of a good thing? A comment on Bart Verheij's legal argumentation support software
Law, Probability and Risk Advance Access published on November 13, 2007
Law Probability and Risk 2007 6: 209-224; doi:10.1093/lpr/mgm038 [PDF] [Request Permissions]  

John D. Lowrance
Graphical manipulation of evidence in structured arguments
Law, Probability and Risk Advance Access published on September 25, 2007
Law Probability and Risk 2007 6: 225-240; doi:10.1093/lpr/mgm011 [Abstract] [PDF] [Request Permissions]  

Kevin D. Ashley
Comment on Lowrance's ‘Graphical manipulation of evidence in structured arguments’
Law, Probability and Risk Advance Access published on July 23, 2007
Law Probability and Risk 2007 6: 241-245; doi:10.1093/lpr/mgm012 [Abstract] [PDF] [Request Permissions]  

David A. Schum and Jon R. Morris
Assessing the competence and credibility of human sources of intelligence evidence: contributions from law and probability
Law, Probability and Risk Advance Access published on August 28, 2007
Law Probability and Risk 2007 6: 247-274; doi:10.1093/lpr/mgm025 [Abstract] [PDF] [Request Permissions]  

Amanda B. Hepler, A. Philip Dawid, and Valentina Leucari
Object-oriented graphical representations of complex patterns of evidence
Law, Probability and Risk Advance Access published on May 24, 2007
Law Probability and Risk 2007 6: 275-293; doi:10.1093/lpr/mgm005 [Abstract] [PDF] [Request Permissions]  

Neal Feigenson and Richard K. Sherwin
Thinking beyond the shown: implicit inferences in evidence and argument
Law, Probability and Risk Advance Access published on October 17, 2007
Law Probability and Risk 2007 6: 295-310; doi:10.1093/lpr/mgm016 [Abstract] [PDF] [Request Permissions]  

David Tait
Rethinking the role of the image in justice: visual evidence and science in the trial process
Law, Probability and Risk Advance Access published on November 13, 2007
Law Probability and Risk 2007 6: 311-318; doi:10.1093/lpr/mgm040 [Abstract] [PDF] [Request Permissions]  

Ron Loui
Comment on the Cardozo conference on graphic and visual representations of evidence and inference in legal settings
Law, Probability and Risk Advance Access published on October 10, 2007
Law Probability and Risk 2007 6: 319-326; doi:10.1093/lpr/mgm028 [PDF] [Request Permissions]  

To see an article, click its [Full Text] or [PDF] link. To review many abstracts, check the boxes to the left of the titles you want, and click the 'Get All Checked Abstract(s)' button. To see one abstract at a time, click its [Abstract] link.