Law, Probability and Risk

Articles

Robert J. Mislevy

Substance and structure in assessment arguments
Law Probablity and Risk 2003 2: 237-258; doi:10.1093/lpr/2.4.237 [Abstract] [PDF] [Request Permissions]  

Anna-Rose Mathieson and Samuel R. Gross

Review for error
Law Probablity and Risk 2003 2: 259-268; doi:10.1093/lpr/2.4.259 [Abstract] [PDF] [Request Permissions]  

Aviva Orenstein

What we say we do on review, what we actually do on review, why they are so dissimilar, and how we manage not to notice
Law Probablity and Risk 2003 2: 269-274; doi:10.1093/lpr/2.4.269 [Abstract] [PDF] [Request Permissions]  

Mike Redmayne

Objective probability and the assessment of evidence
Law Probablity and Risk 2003 2: 275-294; doi:10.1093/lpr/2.4.275 [Abstract] [PDF] [Request Permissions]  

Edward Stein

The admissibility of expert testimony about cognitive science research on eyewitness identification
Law Probablity and Risk 2003 2: 295-303; doi:10.1093/lpr/2.4.295 [Abstract] [PDF] [Request Permissions]  

Roger C. Park

Eyewitness identification: expert witnesses are not the only solution
Law Probablity and Risk 2003 2: 305-308; doi:10.1093/lpr/2.4.305 [Abstract] [PDF] [Request Permissions]  

David L. Faigman

Making moral judgments through behavioural science: the ‘substantial lack of volitional control’ requirement in civil commitments
Law Probablity and Risk 2003 2: 309-319; doi:10.1093/lpr/2.4.309 [Abstract] [PDF] [Request Permissions]  

To see an article, click its [Full Text] or [PDF] link. To review many abstracts, check the boxes to the left of the titles you want, and click the 'Get All Checked Abstract(s)' button. To see one abstract at a time, click its [Abstract] link.