Skip Navigation



Law, Probability and Risk Advance Access published online on August 19, 2007

Law, Probability and Risk, doi:10.1093/lpr/mgm018
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
7/1/1    most recent
mgm018v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Parsons, N.
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2007]. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.

Rotationally invariant statistics for examining the evidence from the pores in fingerprints

NR Parsons{dagger}, JQ Smith{ddagger} and E Thönnes§

Department of Statistics, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK

L Wang and RG Wilson||

Department of Computer Science, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK

{dagger} n.parsons.1{at}warwick.ac.uk

{ddagger} j.q.smith{at}warwick.ac.uk

§ Corresponding author. Email: e.thonnes{at}warwick.ac.uk

li.wang{at}warwick.ac.uk

|| roland.wilson{at}warwick.ac.uk

Received on 3 December 2004. Revised on 31 May 2007. Accepted on 15 June 2007.


   Abstract

Recent methodological advances in the processing of DNA evidence have begun to force a closer examination of assertions about the strength of other sorts of evidence. One traditional source of evidence is the fingerprint. Currently a print taken from a suspect is compared against a mark from a crime scene and a match declared using the judgement of an expert based on matching minutiae and the ridge patterns around these. However, such methods have proved difficult to quantify effectively. This has provoked the investigation of even finer features in the print and the mark. One set of such features are the many pores, located along the ridges of the fingerprint. Is it possible to supplement expert judgements associated with a match with a more automatic and quantitative measure of the strength of evidence, based on pore information? The results of this preliminary analysis suggest we can. Our methodology is relatively transparent, using common statistics for two sample comparisons of point patterns. The results discussed here concern the matching of inked prints using grey-level imaging and complement previous studies which tend to focus on the comparison of binarised images.

Keywords: fingerprints; level 3 features; pore pattern; pore extraction; non-parametric spatial statistics


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.