Law, Probability and Risk Advance Access originally published online on August 10, 2009
Law, Probability and Risk 2009 8(2):73-83; doi:10.1093/lpr/mgp019
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© The Author [2009]. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.
Some thoughts at the interface of law and statistics
School of Mathematics, King's Buildings, University of Edinburgh, Mayfield Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JZ
* Email: c.g.g.aitken{at}ed.ac.uk
Received on 3 April 2009. Revised on 30 June 2009. Accepted on 1 July 2009.
| Abstract |
|---|
The role of probabilistic and statistical reasoning in two murder trials in England is described. Suggestions are made as to what is required of statisticians who wish to become involved in the judicial process and as to what is required of lawyers who wish to present probabilistic ideas into the courtroom.
Keywords: evidence; forensic science; propositions; statistics
Presented at a workshop held at George Washington University, August 1st 2009, in honour of the 70th birthday of Joe Gastwirth, one of the founding editors of Law, Probability and Risk.