Skip Navigation


Law, Probability and Risk Advance Access originally published online on July 23, 2007
Law, Probability and Risk 2007 6(1-4):241-245; doi:10.1093/lpr/mgm012
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
6/1-4/241    most recent
mgm012v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ashley, K. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2007]. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.

Comment on Lowrance's ‘Graphical manipulation of evidence in structured arguments’

Kevin D. Ashley{dagger}

School of Law and Learning Research and Development Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA

{dagger} Email: ashley{at}pitt.edu.

Received on 20 April 2007. Accepted on 24 April 2007.


  Abstract

Lowrance's use of template-based structured argumentation and a collaborative tool in which graphical depictions convey lines of reasoning from evidence to conclusions has real potential for supporting legal tasks such as complaint drafting, especially if the tool were extended in various ways.

Keywords: structured arguments; collaborative software tool; graphical representations; SEAS; legal applications

Presented at the workshop on ‘Graphic and visual representations of evidence and inference in legal settings’ at Cardozo School of Law, New York City, 28–29 January 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.